Gender Relations in Ancient India: An Anthropological Study of Women’s Position in the Vedic Period and its Contemporary Legacy

The study of women's position during the Vedic period (c. 1500–600 BCE) serves as a vital barometer for assessing the socio-cultural development of ancient Indian civilization.¹ This era presents a profound anthropological dichotomy: an initial phase marked by relative autonomy and intellectual parity, followed by a dramatic structural decline leading to codified patriarchy. Understanding this trajectory requires a critical examination of Vedic texts, which constitute the foundational source of Hindu religious and social thought.

I.A. Periodization and Source Material

The Vedic corpus is fundamentally divided into two chronological and ideological segments. The Early Vedic Period, or Rig Vedic Age (c. 1500–1000 BCE), draws primarily from the Rigveda Samhita (specifically the family books), reflecting a more decentralized, possibly semi-nomadic society.4 The Later Vedic Period (c. 1000–600 BCE) encompasses the later books of the Rigveda Samhita (^{Books 1,
8, 9, 10)}, the Brahmanas, Aranyakas, Upanishads, and the precursor texts to the Dharmashastras.⁴ This subsequent literature arose during a time of settled agriculture and institutional consolidation, documenting the emergence of Varna distinctions and centralized political structures.

It is crucial to note that Hindu religion upholds the Vedas as the highest authority. The perspective advanced by later legalistic texts, such as the Smritis and Puranas, which often contradict the egalitarian spirit found in the earliest Vedic material, are theoretically meant to be disregarded.⁵ However, the institutionalization of the later, more restrictive norms proved historically pervasive, necessitating a detailed comparison of the two Vedic phases to chart the precise arc of gender decline.

I.B. The Central Anthropological Thesis: The Dichotomy of Status

The central argument established by this analysis is that the position of women during the Vedic period experienced a critical transformation from relative parity and ritual inclusion in the Early Vedic Age to severe structural degradation in the Later Vedic and subsequent Smriti Ages.^4,
1 This decline was not accidental or arbitrary; it was a necessary sociological outcome driven by fundamental shifts in the material and ritual economy.¹⁸

As society transitioned from a mobile, tribal structure to a settled, agrarian, and highly stratified one, control over inheritance, property, and the exclusive domain of professionalized rituals became paramount.¹⁸ This structural evolution catalyzed the creation of formalized patriarchal control.¹ The shifting status of women, from respected co-participant to dependent subordinate, therefore serves as the most effective metric of societal change and control in ancient India.⁵

I.C. Establishing the Analytical Framework

This essay applies an analytical framework centered on the power dynamics inherent in the ritual sphere. In the Vedic era, ritual competence determined social capital and authority. The focus is placed on how the structural control mechanisms—specifically the codification of ritual exclusion (e.g., removal of Upanayana) and the institutionalization of economic dependency—served to redefine gender roles.⁴ By applying concepts of social constructionism, it becomes clear how changes in material conditions led to the symbolic and legal subjugation of women, establishing precedents that continue to echo in contemporary Indian legal and social frameworks.¹⁶

II. The Early Vedic Paradigm (Rig Vedic Age): Autonomy and Esteem

The Rig Vedic Age (c. 1500–1000 BCE) is often viewed as the "golden age" for women in ancient India, characterized by a society where women possessed noticeable agency in domestic, intellectual, and religious spheres.⁴ This period lacked the institutionalised restrictions that would define later eras.

II.A. Religious and Spiritual Sovereignty (Dampati and Ritual Inclusion)

In the Early Vedic context, women were accorded a high place of honor, particularly in religious life. 2 Vedic literature consistently demonstrates a uniform spirit of reverence for womanhood and does not deny women religious rights.⁵ Crucially, religious ceremonies and sacrifices were required to be performed jointly by spouses (Dampati).^{1, 7} This mandated joint participation meant that the wife was an indispensable partner in the central religious-economic activity of the household.²

The functional necessity of the wife in completing the Yajna (sacrifice)—the most important political and social transaction of the time—endowed her with significant structural importance. By holding this essential ritual role, the wife possessed implicit authority and was protected from ritual exclusion, guaranteeing her status as an active agent rather than a passive recipient of ritual benefits. Women were fully expected to participate in Vedic sacrifices and to utter sacred mantras.¹⁵ This reverence for the feminine principle was further enshrined in the devotion shown to major goddesses, such as Aditi (the goddess of freedom), Sarasvati (best mother, best of goddesses), and Durga^{1, 13}, reinforcing the concept of feminine power, or Shakti.

II.B. Educational Attainment and Intellectual Class

The Early Vedic society provided women with ample opportunities to achieve high intellectual and spiritual standards.^{1, 3} The existence of formal categories for scholarly women underscores their recognized status within the intellectual hierarchy.¹

Scholarly women were broadly categorized into two classes: the Brahmavadinis, who were dedicated, lifelong celibate scholars of the Vedas, and the Sadyodvahas, who pursued Vedic studies until they were married. ^{1, 3} Panini, a later grammarian, acknowledged the existence of female students studying Vedic literature, and other scholars referenced female teachers using terms like Upadhyaya or Upadhyayi.^1,
3

Illustrative examples include the revered female philosophers and seers (Rishis) whose intellectual contributions are recorded in the texts.^{1, 3} Figures such as Gargi, famous for her rigorous intellectual debates (Shastrarth)¹⁵; Maitreyi; Apala; and Ghosha were celebrated for their character and intellect. They were recognized as Mantra-perceivers and considered equal to men in their capacity to access the ultimate knowledge of the Absolute.¹²

Crucially, the Samskara (initiation rite) was performed for the daughter as well as the son, indicating non-discrimination in access to the foundational ritual required for education.⁵ Later textual evidence, such as the Gobhila Grihya Sutra, explicitly mentions the bride wearing the sacred sacrificial thread (yajnopavitinim) during the wedding ceremony, confirming the historical practice of Upanayana for women.²³ The possession of Upanayana granted women access to Vedic knowledge, which served as powerful symbolic capital. This cultural authority enabled women to contest or participate in the male-dominated intellectual economy, a status that would be deliberately revoked in subsequent periods.

II.C. Socio-Political Agency and Domestic Life

The autonomy afforded to Early Vedic women extended into the socio-political realm. Evidence suggests that women were actively involved in political decision-making processes, participating in assemblies such as the Sabha (council of elders) and the Samiti (general assembly). ^{11, 6} This high political visibility is attributed, in part, to the social and political stability of the Early Vedic era, which allowed women to assert their rights and engage in socio-cultural activities.⁶

Marriage customs reflected this elevated status. Monogamy was the common practice, although polygamy was observed among the wealthier strata of society. ^{1, 3} Women enjoyed the freedom to choose their own husbands, often through the practice of Swayamvara.¹² Practices that would later become hallmarks of Indian patriarchy, such as Sati (widow burning), child marriage, and the Purdah (veiling/seclusion), were nonexistent in the Early Vedic period. ^1,
3 Furthermore, divorce was permitted, and widow remarriage was allowed, suggesting relative control over one’s reproductive and marital life.²¹

Economically, women were important contributors, engaging in household production activities like spinning and weaving, and often helping their husbands in agricultural pursuits. ^{1, 21} The existence of these freedoms—both physical (no Purdah, freedom of movement) and marital (choice, remarriage)—is anthropologically linked to the early phase of settlement. During this time, the population needed growth and productivity, making women indispensable members of the society who could not be treated with patronage or contempt. ²¹ Control over female sexuality and reproduction had not yet become the central, rigid preoccupation of the developing patriarchal structure.

III. The Later Vedic Transition: Erosion of Rights and Ritual Exclusion (c. 1000–600 BCE)

The Later Vedic period marked a definitive structural shift, transitioning from the comparative egalitarianism of the Rig Vedic era to an increasingly stratified society defined by fixed territory, complex ritualism, and the emerging Varna system.⁴ This era saw a sharp and evident decline in women’s social and religious standing. ⁴

III.A. Sociological Drivers of the Decline

The degradation of women’s status was intrinsically linked to profound socio-economic shifts. The move toward permanent agricultural settlement and the consolidation of territorial states required stricter delineation and control over property, inheritance, and lineage purity, necessitating guaranteed legitimate male heirs. ¹⁸

Simultaneously, the ritual sphere became markedly more complex and exclusive. The large-scale Yajnas became elaborate and professionalized, shifting ritual power away from the inclusive domestic sphere (Dampati ritual) to a specialized, professionalized priesthood (Brahmanas). The consolidation of the four-caste system (Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, Sudra) further compounded restrictions, preventing women from securing higher social positions compared to the earlier period. ⁸

The decline in women’s utility outside the reproductive domain played a significant role. Scholars suggest that the comparatively higher status of women in the Early Vedic period was partly attributable to their usefulness in the economy (agriculture, manufacturing) when men were preoccupied with conquest and consolidation.²¹ As society stabilized and more readily available labor emerged, women’s economic independence diminished, allowing the emerging patriarchal structure to treat them with greater contempt and patronage.²¹

III.B. The Ritual Death: Discontinuance of Upanayana

The single most disastrous structural change impacting the social and family status of women was the formal discontinuance of the Upanayana Samskara, or initiation ceremony.^{21, 20}

This withdrawal of the right to initiation served as a powerful ritual demotion, stripping women of the requisite symbolic capital necessary for intellectual and spiritual autonomy. Without Upanayana, women were rendered ineligible for Vedic studies, unable to recite or hear Vedic prayers, and the hymns of daily ritual became unintelligible to them.²² This effectively reduced women’s status to that of the Sudras, as they were formally placed outside the dwija (regenerate classes).^{20, 22}

This act fundamentally redefined the power structure. The loss of ritual access immediately resulted in the loss of intellectual capital, which in turn structurally justified the denial of women’s right to independent social and political action. By excluding women from the primary source of authority—Vedic knowledge—the male-dominated structure secured a permanent monopoly on spiritual and intellectual mediation.

III.C. Ritual Impurity and Religious Exclusion

The decline was further cemented by the codification of rules concerning ritual pollution, particularly related to the female body. Later Vedic texts began to reflect the notion that the menstrual blood of women was dangerous and polluting.⁴

This symbolic control had immediate, practical consequences: a menstruating wife was forbidden from participating in sacrifices, which either had to be postponed or performed without her. By attaching a powerful stigma of ritual danger and impurity to a natural, recurring female biological process, the patriarchal ritual structure created a constant, intrinsic reason for physical and religious exclusion. This constant threat of ritual pollution served as a powerful control mechanism, internalizing female inferiority and ensuring perpetual, ritual-based subordination across all segments of the female population. Consequently, women were completely forbidden from performing penance. ⁴

The combination of the loss of Upanayana and the imposition of ritual impurity rules meant that by the Later Vedic Period, women had transitioned from being essential ritual partners to passive, often polluting, observers. Women were not allowed to join politics or perform many religious activities.^{21, 8}

The following table summarizes the structural transformation:

Table 1: Comparative Status of Women in the Vedic Periods

Aspect	Early Vedic (Rig Vedic Age, c. 1500–1000 BCE)	Later Vedic (c. 1000–600 BCE onwards)	Anthropological Significance
Education	High status (Brahmavadinis, Sadyodvahas). Right to Upanayana.	Discontinued Upanayana; Status equated with Sudras. Education is neglected, resulting in mass illiteracy.	Loss of ritual and intellectual capital, justifying exclusion.
Religious Role	Joint participation in sacrifices (Dampati). Women Rishis.	Exclusion from major rites; imposition of impurity stigma (menstruation). Completely forbidden from penance.	Shift from essential ritual partner to passive or polluting observer.
Political Agency	Participation in Sabha and Samiti.	Women barred from public meetings and political activity.	Complete marginalization from public sphere and decision-making structures.
Marriage/Customs	Freedom of choice (Swayamvara); Monogamy common; No Sati or child marriage.	Child marriage and lowering of marriage age; Polygamy common; Sati and Purdah introduced/worsened.	Assertion of patriarchal control over female reproduction and sexuality.

IV. Codification of Subordination: Dharmashastras and the Institutionalization of Dependency

The structural decline initiated in the Later Vedic period was finalized and institutionalized through the subsequent rise of legal texts, primarily the Smritis and Dharmashastras (c. 600 BCE onwards), which formalized dependency as state-sanctioned law.⁷

IV.A. The Textual Enforcement of Patriarchy

The age of the Dharmashastras and Smritis solidified the immense decline, reducing women’s power in both ideological and economic spheres.⁴ Texts like Kautilya’s Arthashastra imposed stigmas, restricting women’s ability to move freely without their husband's permission.³ However, the most definitive and enduring codification came from the Manusmriti, authored around 100 CE.⁴

The Manusmriti enforced a rigorous ban and oppression, restricting women’s right to education and forbidding them from performing penance, sacrifices, or giving prayers. This text was instrumental in cementing the idea that women were inherently inferior and impure.⁴

IV.B. The Doctrine of Perpetual Dependency (Manu’s Dictum)

The core sociological mandate of this period was the doctrine of perpetual dependency. Manu explicitly dictated that a woman must be dependent on her father during childhood, her husband in youth, and her son in old age.^{12, 3} This formulation strictly bound women’s identity to male relatives, effectively denying them independent status or the right to self-determination.^{4, 19} Manu’s law declared that “a woman does not deserve freedom,” ensuring her existence was one of continuous reliance on male authority. ⁴

This doctrine served a vital structural function: the stabilization of patrilineal kinship. By denying women independent social status, the law prevented the fragmentation of ancestral property and guaranteed the purity of descent lines, which were crucial for maintaining the newly complex Varna system. This approach shifted the basis of control from custom to state-sanctioned legal codification, ensuring the persistence of subordination across political and social shifts.

Furthermore, a wife's primary spiritual duty was redefined. She was mandated to serve and worship her husband, even if he lacked virtue or character, as the prescribed means of attaining heaven. This theological argument suggested that women attained salvation by surrendering their ego and serving others, thereby justifying and reinforcing their passive, subordinate role within the household.⁴

IV.C. Economic Limitations and Property Rights

Economic disempowerment became the primary secular tool reinforcing the ritual disempowerment initiated by the loss of Upanayana. Brahmanical law and the Smritis denied women significant proprietary rights, specifically excluding them from ownership or inheritance of ancestral or marital property.¹³

The concept of women’s personal assets, Stridhana, was restricted primarily to gifts received during marriage (such as jewelry and clothing). ¹³ Although the Arthashastra permitted women to possess up to 2,000 silver Panas, any amount exceeding this was held in trust by the husband. 13 The husband’s use of this property was restricted to cases of extreme necessity. 13 However, the overall structure reinforced women’s economic dependency on male kin, severely limiting their ability to live independently. 13

The severity of this control is highlighted by references where women were treated as commodities, sometimes given away or loaned like material possessions, reflecting a patriarchal system rooted in the strict control of private property. ^{12, 13} This system ensured that economic autonomy, the critical counterweight to ritual exclusion, was thoroughly denied.

The mechanisms of subordination, as codified in the Later Vedic and subsequent periods, were comprehensive:

Table 2: Mechanisms of Legal and Ritual Subordination (Post-Vedic Codification)

Mechanism/Text	Time Period	Consequence for Women	Anthropological Function
Discontinuance of Upanayana	Later Vedic/Sutra Age	Loss of status as Dwijas; spiritual exclusion.	Justification for denying access to intellectual/ritual capital; symbolic declassification.
Manusmriti (Perpetual Dependency)	Smriti Age (c. 100 CE)	Codified subordination: dependent on father, husband, and son; denial of freedom.	Stabilization of patrilineal kinship and property transfer; institutionalization of male authority.
Denial of Ancestral Inheritance	Ancient Law Schools (Mitakshara/Dayabhaga)	Economic dependency; Stridhana limited to personal gifts.	Ensures property remains within the male lineage, eliminating female economic autonomy.
Ritual Impurity Rules	Later Vedic Texts	Exclusion from religious acts during menstruation; defined as polluting.	Symbolic control over the female body; constant reminder of ritual inferiority.

V. The Vedic Legacy in the Contemporary Indian Context

The structural inequalities institutionalized during the Later Vedic and Smriti periods have demonstrated profound historical inertia, shaping the social, political, cultural, educational, and economic status of women well into modern times.¹⁸ Contemporary Indian society grapples with the tension between the constitutional promise of equality and the deeply ingrained patriarchal frameworks inherited from these ancient codifications.¹⁹

V.A. The Long Shadow of Vedic Patriarchy

The legacy of the Dharmashastras meant that even colonial law often interpreted and cemented the most restrictive interpretations of Hindu legal texts, further formalizing patriarchal norms, particularly in matters of inheritance. ^{19, 17}

Modern feminist analyses, often employing theories such as social constructionism and liberal feminism (drawing parallels with Simone de Beauvoir's critiques of Western patriarchy) ¹⁶, critically explore how these historical texts and structural factors have continuously restricted women’s roles. Indian society today thus reflects an ideological conflict: on one hand, the philosophical reverence for women as mother goddesses (Janani or Shakti), echoing the Early Vedic reverence for female deities and intellectualism^{12, 13, 11}; and on the other hand, the practical implementation of subordination dictated by the Smriti tradition, leading to continued social and structural challenges.¹⁶

V.B. Legal Systems and Inherited Inequity

Post-independence India sought to address gender inequality through legal reform, but the tenacity of ancient norms proved challenging. The initial codification of Hindu personal laws, particularly the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, granted women inheritance rights but retained significant structural inequities.¹³

In the 1950s, while sons were entitled to an independent share of ancestral property, daughters’ shares were derived solely from their father's portion.¹³ This subtle difference in legal status preserved a deep-seated patrilineal preference inherited from the Smriti-era Mitakshara law school, which prioritized male lineage. This structure meant that a father could disinherit a daughter by relinquishing his share of the ancestral property, whereas the son’s share remained unaffected. Furthermore, married daughters lacked residential rights in the ancestral home under these 1950s laws, reinforcing their dependency on their marital families and cutting off rights to the family of origin. ¹³

This structural flaw demonstrated that the ancient denial of proprietary rights persisted in the modern legal framework. It perpetuated the foundational patriarchal control mechanism that restricted women’s economic independence from male kin.

V.C. Landmark Legal Reversal: The Restoration of Economic Equity

The most significant legal effort to dismantle the structural patriarchy inherited from the Later Vedic and Smriti periods is the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.¹³

This landmark reform directly challenged the foundational economic discrimination that had endured for centuries. ¹⁹ The 2005 Amendment granted daughters equal inheritance rights to ancestral property, placing them on par with sons by recognizing them as coparceners (joint owners by birth). ¹³ This move directly reversed Manu’s economic dictum and the subsequent denial of a woman’s right to ancestral property.

The anthropological significance of the 2005 Act is profound. It represents a modern legal attempt to restore the structural parity lost when women were systematically denied economic autonomy and classified as dependent on men. By granting co-parcenary status, the Indian state legally dismantled the key mechanism (exclusion from ancestral property) that had reinforced the doctrine of perpetual dependency for millennia.

Table 3: The Historical and Contemporary Legal Arc of Female Property Rights

Era	Key Legal Status/Norm	Historical Legacy of Vedic Patriarchy	Modern Legal Correction
Later Vedic/Smritis	Women viewed as property; Stridhana limited to personal gifts.	Institutionalized economic dependency on male kin (Manu's Dictum).	Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937 (Limited rights for widows).
Post-Independence Law (1956)	Women granted inheritance, but daughters’ ancestral share was indirect and unequal (derived from father’s portion).	Continuation of ancestral exclusion, preventing women from being coparceners (joint owners by birth).	The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Codification, but incomplete equality).
Contemporary (Post-2005)	Equal rights for daughters and sons in ancestral property (Coparcenary rights restored).	Dismantled: The long-standing legal gender gap rooted in the Smritis.	Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.

VI. Conclusion: Synthesis and Enduring Significance

The history of women's position during the Vedic period is characterized by a structural shift from a functional, respected, and ritually integrated partner in the Early Vedic Age to a legally and ritually dependent subordinate in the Later Vedic and Smriti Ages. The sociological analysis confirms that this decline was not a random cultural change but a direct result of structural necessities tied to the consolidation of a settled, patrilineal, and caste-based society.

The defining turning point was the ritual demotion of women, symbolized by the withdrawal of the Upanayana right, which stripped them of the intellectual and ritual authority necessary to maintain parity with men.^{20, 22} This symbolic disenfranchisement was swiftly followed by the legal codification of subordination in the Manusmriti, which institutionalized perpetual dependency and, crucially, denied women full proprietary rights over ancestral property.^{4, 13} Economic disempowerment, enforced through legal mechanisms, thus became the primary, enduring tool for maintaining the patriarchal structure.

The significance of this ancient history in the contemporary world is profound. The constitutional and legal battles currently waged in India—particularly those concerning equal inheritance—are, in essence, attempts to legally reverse the thousands of years of systemic discrimination established during the transition from the Early to the Later Vedic Period.^13,
19 The 2005 amendment, by granting daughters equal rights in ancestral property, constitutes a monumental legal effort to transcend the limitations of codified patriarchy and align modern social structure with the constitutional ideal of equality, potentially fulfilling the promise of the egalitarian spirit found in the earliest Rig Vedic ideal.

VII. References

MAHASWETA YADAV. The Position and Status of Women in Vedic Culture: A Critical Analysis. URL:(https://recruitment.msdsuonline.in/Upload/ResearchPapers/13349.pdf)

Kumar, A. (2023). Position as Reflected in Rigveda. Anthropo-Indialogs, 3(1), 20-21. URL: https://www.arfjournals.com/image/catalog/Journals%20Papers/Anthropo/2023/No%201%20(2023)/3_Awadhesh%20Kumar.pdf

Rout, N. (2016). Role of Women in Ancient India. Odisha Review, 43-48. URL: https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2016/Jan/engpdf/43-48.pdf

Barman, M. (2023). The Spiritual State and Spirituality of Women in the Vedic Period. International Journal of Formal Engineering and Management Research, 6(6), 8215. URL: https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2023/6/8215.pdf

Barman, M. (2021). The Position of Women in the Vedic Ritual. ResearchGate. URL:(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342692664_The_Position_of_Women_in_the_Vedic_Ritual)

Nagalaxmi, V. (2022). The Role and position of women in Vedic period in India. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 11(11), 51-53. URL: https://www.ijhssi.org/papers/vol11(11)/U1111151153.pdf

Status of Women in Ancient India: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern. Sociology Discussion. URL: https://www.sociologydiscussion.com/status-of-women/status-of-women-in-india-ancient-medieval-and-modern-sociology/13526

Soni, R. K., et al. (2024). STATUS OF WOMEN IN THE EPICS. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 12(9), A716. URL:(https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2409082.pdf)

MAHASWETA YADAV. The Position and Status of Women in Vedic Culture: A Critical Analysis. URL:((https://recruitment.msdsuonline.in/Upload/ResearchPapers/13349.pdf))

Nagalaxmi, V. (2025). Status of Women in Ancient India. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 30(4), 40-46. URL:(https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.30-Issue4/Ser-4/D3004044046.pdf)

Pathania, R. (2023). Position of Women in Ancient India. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Parapsychology, 5(2), 26-28. URL: https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/download/3256/2116/3712

V. S. (2025). Historical Evolution of Economic Rights of Women in Hindu Law. International Journal of Formal Engineering and Management Research, 8(2), 36783. URL: https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/2/36783.pdf

Reshma. (2023). Status of Women in Ancient Society. Zenodo. URL:((https://zenodo.org/record/7957069/files/Reshma.pdf))

Aryal, S., et al. (2025). Exploring Women's Roles from Vedic to Modern Times: A Feminist Perspective. The Outlook: Journal of English Studies. URL:((https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393677213_Exploring_Women's_Roles_from_Vedic_to_Modern_Times_A_Feminist_Perspective))

Nair, J. (2025). Women and Colonial Law. Cambridge University Press. URL:(https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9A1F54D2DFFEDE956B37338B03126402/9781009597005AR.pdf?event-type=FTLA)

Mohod, D. M. (2023). The decline of women's status from the post-Vedic period to the modern era. Revista Ciência Multidisciplinar Online, 7(3), e-107. URL: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/7039/703973410005/html/

Rani, L. (2024). Legal Status of Women in Ancient and Modern Indian Society: A Comparative Study. Zenodo. URL: https://zenodo.org/records/14840649/files/6---41-50.pdf?download=1

Sharma, S. (2018). The Status of Women in Ancient India. ResearchGate. URL:(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323166771_The_Status_of_Women_in_Ancient_India)

Khullar, D. K. (2020). Position of Women in Vedic and Post Vedic Period in India. International Journal of Research, 7(9). URL: https://journals.pen2print.org/index.php/ijr/article/download/20262/19856

Sultana, S. (2018). Women in Ancient India: A Study of the Changing Status of Women. Journal of Arts, Science & Business, 2(1). URL:(https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/JASBH/article/download/82652/53820/227358)

Gobhila Grhya Sutra 3:7,13. Reddit/Hinduism. URL: https://www.reddit.com/r/hinduism/comments/18e8zh8/why_cant_women_have-an-upnayan-ceremony/

ANTHROPOLOGY FOR BEGINNERS

About the blog

Thursday, 23 October 2025